Current:Home > NewsAppeals court declines to reconsider dispute over Trump gag order, teeing up potential Supreme Court fight -MoneySpot
Appeals court declines to reconsider dispute over Trump gag order, teeing up potential Supreme Court fight
View
Date:2025-04-27 18:43:03
Washington — A federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., rejected a request by former President Donald Trump to reconsider an order limiting what he can say about his criminal case related to the aftermath of the 2020 election, setting up a potential Supreme Court fight over the matter.
In a short unsigned order issued Tuesday, the judges from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied Trump's request that they take up the dispute over the gag order "en banc," meaning in front of the full court. A three-judge panel largely upheld the gag order in December, allowing Trump to request a review by the full appeals court.
U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, who is overseeing the case brought by special counsel Jack Smith against Trump in Washington, issued an order in October at the request of Smith that barred Trump from making inflammatory remarks targeting Smith, his staff, court personnel and possible witnesses who may be called to testify in the case.
The three-judge panel upheld most of Chutkan's order, ruling that Trump cannot target potential witnesses or speak publicly about any lawyers involved in the case — except Smith himself — or their families. However, Trump can continue criticizing the Biden administration and the Justice Department, and can claim that Smith's prosecution is politically motivated.
Tuesday's order denying Trump's appeal indicated the decision was unanimous, with no judges requesting a vote on the matter. Trump's attorneys had previously indicated that they would likely take the matter to the Supreme Court if the appeals court did not rule in their favor.
CBS News has reached out to Trump's campaign for comment.
In the December order, the three judges — Patricia Millett, Cornelia Pillard and Bradley Garcia — said they agreed with Chutkan that some aspects of Trump's public comments "pose a significant and imminent threat" to the integrity of the ongoing criminal prosecution, "warranting a speech-constraining protective order."
But the judges also said the order put in place by Chutkan "sweeps in more protected speech than is necessary" and struck down portions of the restrictions, including those that prevented Trump from publicly speaking about Smith.
Trump was charged with four counts related to alleged efforts to prevent the transfer of presidential power after the 2020 election. He has pleaded not guilty and denied all wrongdoing.
The former president's legal team argued that any gag order infringed on Trump's right to free speech, especially on the campaign trail, and linked his outspoken criticism about the special counsel's criminal case to his bid to return to the White House. Smith's team, however, contended that some of Trump's public comments and social media posts jeopardized a fair trial and the security of those involved.
The trial was originally scheduled for March, but the case is on hold as the appeals court considers Trump's separate claim of presidential immunity from prosecution. Chutkan rejected that argument last year and ruled that while all trial deadlines are paused, the restrictions of the gag order remain in effect as the appeals process plays out.
Robert LegareRobert Legare is a CBS News multiplatform reporter and producer covering the Justice Department, federal courts and investigations. He was previously an associate producer for the "CBS Evening News with Norah O'Donnell."
veryGood! (35)
Related
- The FTC says 'gamified' online job scams by WhatsApp and text on the rise. What to know.
- Son treks 11 miles through Hurricane Helene devastation to check on North Carolina parents
- Powerball winning numbers for September 30: Jackpot rises to $258 million
- Dad traveled miles on foot through Hurricane Helene's damage to walk daughter down aisle
- Opinion: Gianni Infantino, FIFA sell souls and 2034 World Cup for Saudi Arabia's billions
- Parents sue school district following wristband protest against transgender girl at soccer game
- Fantasy football waiver wire: 10 players to add for NFL Week 5
- Dad traveled miles on foot through Hurricane Helene's damage to walk daughter down aisle
- Alex Murdaugh’s murder appeal cites biased clerk and prejudicial evidence
- Bowl projections: College football Week 5 brings change to playoff field
Ranking
- Justice Department, Louisville reach deal after probe prompted by Breonna Taylor killing
- Streets of mud: Helene dashes small town's hopes in North Carolina
- John Amos, 'Good Times' and 'Roots' trailblazer and 'Coming to America' star, dies at 84
- Louisiana governor plans to call third special session to overhaul the state’s tax system
- Why Sean "Diddy" Combs Is Being Given a Laptop in Jail Amid Witness Intimidation Fears
- Gossip Girl's Kelly Rutherford Shares Update on Life in Monaco After Years-Long Custody Battle
- Dead inmate identified as suspect in 1995 disappearance of 6-year-old Morgan Nick
- Ex-leaders of a Penn State frat will spend time in jail for their roles in a hazing death
Recommendation
This was the average Social Security benefit in 2004, and here's what it is now
Larry Laughlin, longtime AP bureau chief for northern New England, dies at 75
Key swing state faces ‘daunting’ level of uncertainty after storm ravages multiple counties
Opinion: Pete Rose knew the Baseball Hall of Fame question would surface when he died
Trump issues order to ban transgender troops from serving openly in the military
Woman who lost husband and son uses probate process to obtain gunman’s records
Kate Hudson's mother Goldie Hawn gushes over her music career: 'She's got talent'
College football at one month: Alabama, Florida State lead surprises and disappointments